Judges rule Franken winner; Coleman to appeal
Please click onto the COMMENTS for the story.
posted by Bob at Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Custom Search
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
A DEMOCRACY TOWN HALL HOME
Do you have a topic you want to discuss at the Town Hall? Email your request to A_Democracy@yahoo.com
“A DEMOCRACY” Disclaimer- While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to this forum express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned
THE ROOF GUYS
Mickey's Diner 1950 7th Street West, St Paul, MN
(651) 698-8387
AX-MAN SURPLUS
1639 University Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55104
Tel:(651)646-8653
LANDLORD.COM LINK HERE
SHHHH! While we listen to words of wisdom from a wise man.
Conscience is the light of the Soul that burns within the chambers of our psychological heart. It is as real as life is. It raises the voice in protest whenever anything is thought of or done contrary to the righteousness. Conscience is a form of truth that has been transferred through our genetic stock in the form of the knowledge of our own acts and feelings as right or wrong. A virtuous and courageous person can alone use the instrument of conscience. He or she can alone hear the inner voice of the soul clearly. In a wicked person this faculty is absent. The sensitive nature of his / her conscience has been destroyed by sin or corruption. Hence he or she is unable to discriminate right from wrong. Those who are leading organizations, business enterprises, institutions and governments should develop this virtue of the ability to use their own conscience. This wisdom of using the clean conscience will enable them to enjoy the freedom.
Dr APJ Kalam, President of India given during the inauguration of the seminar on “THE EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION ON GOOD GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Previous Posts
- HAVE A HAPPY EASTER!
- www.Minnesota-Medical-Marijuana.com
- Chinese-made drywall blamed for house problems
- Saint Paul/ This meeting is being held to discuss ...
- More squatters call foreclosures home
- Mpls. pays settlement to black officers in bias suit
- St. Paul bans candy in form of tobacco
- Pigeons
- Ex-cop pleads guilty in man's stabbing, accused vi...
- St. Paul police shoot, kill armed man, 34, in alle...
11 Comments:
By PAT DOYLE, Star Tribune
Last update: April 14, 2009 - 5:59 AM
Coleman team vows to appeal tally
Three judges soundly rejected Norm Coleman's attempt to reverse Al Franken's lead in the U.S. Senate election late Monday, sweeping away the Republican's claims in a blunt ruling Coleman promised to appeal.
After a trial spanning nearly three months, the judicial panel dismissed Coleman's central argument that the election and its aftermath were fraught with systemic errors that made the results invalid.
"The overwhelming weight of the evidence indicates that the Nov. 4, 2008, election was conducted fairly, impartially and accurately," the panel said in its unanimous decision.
The panel concluded that Franken, a DFLer, "received the highest number of votes legally cast" in the election. Franken emerged from the trial with a 312-vote lead, the court ruled, and "is therefore entitled to receive the certificate of election."
Speaking to reporters outside his downtown Minneapolis condominium, Franken, flanked by his wife, Franni, said he had "no control" over what Coleman does next but said he would urge his opponent not to appeal, which would delay his certification. "I am honored and humbled by this close victory," he said. "And it's long past time we got to work."
In an interview earlier in the day, Coleman said he believes "thousands" of rejected votes should have been counted.
Coleman legal spokesman Ben Ginsberg said the ruling denies many valid votes by applying a stricter standard to determining eligible ballots than local officials applied during the recount.
"This order ignores the reality of what happened in the counties and cities on Election Day in terms of counting the votes," Ginsberg said, asserting that Coleman must appeal to assure that valid votes are counted. Coleman's lawyers have 10 days to file an appeal with the Minnesota Supreme Court.
But experts who read the panel's 68-page ruling say it effectively attacks some of the very arguments that Coleman would use on appeal.
"It is the kind of opinion that is unlikely to be disturbed on appeal by either the Minnesota Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court," said Richard Hasen, an expert on election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. "The opinion considers the major arguments made by Coleman and rejects them in a detailed and measured way."
Added University of Minnesota political scientist Lawrence Jacobs: "This is judicial speak for 'nothing here,' and it is most definitely aimed at the appeals process. It's a signal that they are supremely unimpressed by the Coleman case."
The office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada released a statement Monday night praising the judges' decision but signaling that he would not move to seat Franken in advance of Coleman's expected appeal:
"Norm Coleman is entitled to appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court. If he does so, we look forward to a prompt decision from that court so that Gov. Pawlenty can issue an election certificate and we can finally bring an end to an episode that has left the people of Minnesota without full representation for too long and has cost taxpayers too much money."
Blunt rejection
The judges said Coleman, trailing Franken by 225-votes after the recount, wanted the panel to ignore Minnesota election law and adopt a more lenient standard allowing illegal absentee ballots to be counted.
The panel was blunt in how it dismissed Coleman claims. A cornerstone of his case was the argument that the judges should count absentee ballots they had deemed illegal during the trial because similar ones had been accepted on Election Day and during the recount.
The panel wrote that Coleman's position would "lead to an absurd result. Following [Coleman's] argument to its conclusion, the court would be compelled to conclude that if one county mistakenly allowed felons to vote, then all counties would have to count the votes of felons."
Moreover, the panel said that Coleman failed to show that "alleged errors or irregularities regarding the treatment of absentee ballots affected the outcome of the election."
The panel took aim at some Coleman claims that will likely figure in any appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court or federal court system. One of those was his argument that widespread problems -- including varying practices by counties in determining which votes to count -- denied many people their right to vote.
"There is no evidence of a systemic problem of disenfranchisement in the state's election system, including in its absentee balloting procedures," the panel wrote.
Bitter battle
The battle over rejected absentee ballots became the centerpiece of the trial because they provided the best chance for Coleman to find votes to overcome the lead that Franken held after the recount.
But that battle became bitter after the judges in February rejected Coleman's bid to count as many as 4,800 absentee ballots. The judges said Minnesota law made absentee voting a privilege and set strict eligibility standards for absentee voting to avoid fraud.
After that ruling, Coleman's lawyers shifted gears and began to attack the legal reasoning of the panel and the practices of state and local elections officials.
The judges in their ruling confronted those arguments head on, defending the integrity of the state's electoral system in the strongest terms at the very end of their ruling.
"The citizens of Minnesota should be proud of their election system," they wrote.
And the judges rejected Coleman claims that Franken netted about 100 votes in Minneapolis after some ballots disappeared and others were counted twice when local officials failed to keep track of damaged original ballots and their duplicates.
"The court did not hear testimony from any precinct election judge that they duplicated damaged ballots and failed to mark the duplicates or the originals," the judges wrote.
Regarding the missing ballots, they wrote: "The record contains no allegation or evidence of fraud or foul play with respect to the missing envelope of ballots." The judges said every indication is that the machine totals from the Minneapolis precinct were accurate.
Staff writers Kevin Duchschere, Mike Kaszuba, Patricia Lopez and Kevin Diaz contributed to this report.
Pat Doyle • 651-222-1210
This is my take on this deal. The Republicans will keep this issue in court until the next election, effectively keeping Frankenstein from doing any damage as our senator.
This is GREAT!
It will be over within the next 60 to 90 days max.
The Supreme Court will hear the case people will understand the silliness of the Coleman "equal treatment" argument, and then Norm will figure out that keeping this going much longer will hurt his ability to function as a rain maker and he will need to let it go.
There is no chance of it going anywhere in Federal Court. The State standard is clear and the counties did a reasonable job to enforce the state standard.
Its over.
As I said somewhere else this is the case:
Coleman argues that if one county went outside of the standard and read one ballot that was not signed correctly, or was late or in some way didn't meet that State standard then all ballots similarly situated need to be treated the same in every county. His thousand or so ballots that he wants counted all would agree didn't meet the state standard, but his point is since somebody got through with an error than everyone should get through with the same error.
Franken argues that if they weren't a registered voter or the ballot was late or they already voted in person or they were a felon sitting in Stillwater, or for whatever legitimate reason the ballot didn't meet the state standard it shouldn't be counted.
The Supreme Court will hear it because its a big case and this issue hasn't been in front of them before. I don't think that Norm has any chance at all at winning it, but that does not mean that the court isn't going to want to be clear that if one person gets to break the law and get away with it (had their ballot read when it should not have been) that we DO NOT have to let everyone get away with it (read all of the ballots from everyone similarly situated).
JMONTOMEPPOF
Chuck Repke
Thank you Bob
Your idea of Al Franken is the same as most people in Minnesota.
This was clearly the most crooked election I remember, I seen first hand how Jesse Ventura and Dean Barkley fixed the 1998 Minnesota's Governor Race.
Win - Lose or Draw !
I will be loyal to Norm Coleman before Al Franken.
At least Norm never did "crack"!
He was a pot smoker.
Bill Dahn
does anyone relate to how the st.paul and minnesota's democrats bowed down to their jewish god.
norm coleman
how did it feel dave thune and chuck repke to bow to norm.
Obama bow to the Saudi king
News reports stated this case could go on for years.
This is good news for Republicans!
They will continue to look like the party of no and obstruction to the will of people and lose even more!
Whatever these results, a big enough majority voted for Franken and he should be seated after the state supreme court decides. Minnesotans don't have to wait for a federal ruling.
There is a ruling, Franken won. If the loser doesn't like it, he can appeal but, the process doesn't stop for appeals- it may be over-turned, but it doesn't stop. Franken will be seated in 10 days.
Bill, these judges have been mostly republicans including Pawlenty's own former personal attorney and campaign chair, and his political legal consultant is the Chief Judge.
What you did with Jesse was illegal and both of you should be in jail for attempted election fraud.
does anyone relate to how the st.paul and minnesota's democrats bowed down to their jewish god.
norm coleman
how did it feel dave thune and chuck repke to bow to norm.
Obama bow to the Saudi king
hey Bill what about gays?
Here Comes The Judge!
Judges are just lawyers that sucked up to some governor, and was appointed as judge and most are not elected.
Does anyone trust judges,
Judge Amundson stole the retarted girls $375,000 trust fund.
Dem. or Rep. judges can be bought.
Bill please stop when you are ahead.
Please don't walk into the setups like a deer in the headlights.
Post a Comment
<< Home