SUMMARY RACKETEERING LAW SUITS AGAINST CITY OF ST. PAUL
LAWSUIT SUMMARY
May, 2004 Steinhauser, Meysembourg, Brisson file Federal Raketeering lawsuit
against the city of St. Paul. Court file #04-2632 JNE/SRN
June, 2004 City launches false criminal charges against Steinhauser. On the day of
Trial, the city of St. Paul moves to dismiss the charges. City inspectors
make the following note in the paperwork: “this is the property owner who
is part of a major lawsuit against us for harassment!!!”
June, 2004 City goes after Steinhauser witness Steve Johnson in Ramsey County
court with false Restraining Order. At trial the matter was dismissed
without Johnson producing a single witness, and the judge commenting
that there was no basis in law or fact for the relief sought by the city.
August, 2004 City goes after another Steinhauser witness named Bee Vue by using a
fraudulent mailing scheme to start a civil lawsuit for trumped up code
violations at 707 Preble.
March, 2005 Harrilal, Johnson, Vue file Federal Racketeering lawsuit against the City
St. Paul. Court file #05-461 JNE/SRN
July, 2005 Gallagher, Collins, Dadder’s Properties, Dadder’s Estates, Dadder’s
Enterprises, Dadder’s Holdings, Troy Allison file Federal Racketeering
Lawuist against the City of St. Paul. Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
December 21, 2005 Jeff & Sara Kubitschek join Federal Racketeering lawsuit
Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
April 25, 2006 Denise Simmons files “Notice of Claim” alleging several violations of
Federal law regarding her house on Sherburne. These notices are usually
the first step in filing a lawsuit.
June, 2006 Akinwale Akinropo files “Notice of Claim” on her property on Bates.
These notices are usually the first step in filing a lawsuit.
As of right now, the Plaintiffs and Defendants are taking Depositions and serving their
serving their “expert reports” on each other.
According to the “Pretrial Scheduling Order” the cases have to be ready for trial on
September 1, 2007.
May, 2004 Steinhauser, Meysembourg, Brisson file Federal Raketeering lawsuit
against the city of St. Paul. Court file #04-2632 JNE/SRN
June, 2004 City launches false criminal charges against Steinhauser. On the day of
Trial, the city of St. Paul moves to dismiss the charges. City inspectors
make the following note in the paperwork: “this is the property owner who
is part of a major lawsuit against us for harassment!!!”
June, 2004 City goes after Steinhauser witness Steve Johnson in Ramsey County
court with false Restraining Order. At trial the matter was dismissed
without Johnson producing a single witness, and the judge commenting
that there was no basis in law or fact for the relief sought by the city.
August, 2004 City goes after another Steinhauser witness named Bee Vue by using a
fraudulent mailing scheme to start a civil lawsuit for trumped up code
violations at 707 Preble.
March, 2005 Harrilal, Johnson, Vue file Federal Racketeering lawsuit against the City
St. Paul. Court file #05-461 JNE/SRN
July, 2005 Gallagher, Collins, Dadder’s Properties, Dadder’s Estates, Dadder’s
Enterprises, Dadder’s Holdings, Troy Allison file Federal Racketeering
Lawuist against the City of St. Paul. Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
December 21, 2005 Jeff & Sara Kubitschek join Federal Racketeering lawsuit
Court file #05-1348 JNE/SRN
April 25, 2006 Denise Simmons files “Notice of Claim” alleging several violations of
Federal law regarding her house on Sherburne. These notices are usually
the first step in filing a lawsuit.
June, 2006 Akinwale Akinropo files “Notice of Claim” on her property on Bates.
These notices are usually the first step in filing a lawsuit.
As of right now, the Plaintiffs and Defendants are taking Depositions and serving their
serving their “expert reports” on each other.
According to the “Pretrial Scheduling Order” the cases have to be ready for trial on
September 1, 2007.
posted by Bob at Friday, September 15, 2006
2 Comments:
With as long as this has been going on and with so many different people all saying the same things, if this were to be any other defendant other than the city of St. Paul, the defendants would have villifed, crucified, and dragged through the mud in every way imaginable by now.
Does anyone think there is any property owner anywhere that could stand this kind of scrunity and allegations and still get the benifet of the doubt from everyone?
I have watched the media side step this story and actually lie about it as seen in the instance of 14 Jessamine.
Sorry, not all media, the Watchdog hasn't side stepped the story.
Post a Comment
<< Home