Custom Search

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Cynthia Schanno for city council ward 2

Topic requested...


Anonymous For immediate release said...

"No group knows better the pulse and life of a city than its realtors," said Cynthia Schanno, "which is why I'm deeply honored and encouraged to have won the endorsement of the Saint Paul Area Association of Realtors." Schanno--a first time candidate for any public office-- received the major endorsement after all candidates from Ward 2 were interviewed by the Association.

Mr. John Periard, Senior Vice President of the Association said: "The board felt strongly that our beloved city desperately needs someone with exceptional business skills. We also felt that it needed someone who could work cooperatively--and not divisively--with others. Cynthia Schanno was the obvious candidate who embodied both qualities."

"I simply told them what I thought the current problems were and what my solutions are," said Schanno, when asked why she beat out a 16-year incumbent for the coveted endorsement. More to the point, Schanno said "The sixteen-year incumbent is part of the problem, not the solution. Unfortunately, he has alienated various constituencies in Ward 2. In these awful economic times, Ward 2 deserves a council member who is respectful, listens to all views and solves problems rather than passes the buck."

"Housing is a crucial concern to everyone in Saint Paul," Schanno observed, "and only by making Saint Paul a desirable, job-friendly place can we expect people to be able to have the income with which to purchase homes." Schanno noted that unemployment remains stubbornly high and that the incumbent has no pro-growth plan to offer Ward 2 residents. "You can't just be on auto-pilot and think you're doing an acceptable job," said Schanno, "at least not in the real world of the private sector. I've built a successful business from the ground up and know what it takes to reduce obstacles and encourage job growth."

Noting that there are 169 vacant buildings in Ward 2 alone, Schanno remarked "These buildings are more than eyesores. They are a visible indication of failure and possibly of a city in decline if we don't take action. As a lifelong resident of Saint Paul, I refuse to stand idly by while conditions worsen. I'll work immediately to reverse this sorry state of affairs on my first day in office."

11:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

someone who could work cooperatively--and not divisively--with others

Cooperatively in the city of Saint Paul? FAT CHANCE!

disgruntled investor

9:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cooperatively in the city of Saint Paul? FAT CHANCE!

"You will comply!!!"

Andy Dawkins

10:05 AM  
Anonymous ward2 videoSharon Anderson said...

Dawkins is supporting Jim Ivey Further check where Schanno lives
or watch the Video will air

5:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


Schanno bought a condo on Spring Street on 11/18/2010.... So, come election day she will have lived in Saint Paul, ten days short of one year... or at least she will have owned property 10 days short of a year.

She continues to own a house in Mendota Heights that she has owned since 1995.

Not that I pay attention to these things or anything....


Chuck Repke

9:33 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You do have to admit that it is at least kind of ironic that she lives in a housing development on the Riverfront that occurred at least in part because of Thune's fighting for the relocation of Sheppard Road away from the river.

Prior to Thune's election in 1989 the plan was to keep Sheppard next to the River and build a grade sepperated interchange (with the west bound turn lanes) where the Science Museum is now.

Thune campaigned on that and pressed a small majority on the council to move the road to where it is now... over the objection of the Chamber of Commerce who wanted the grade separated interchange (which needed the road pressed to the river to work).

So, she lives in a place Thune envisioned and would not have happened but for Thune.



Chuck Repke

9:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ya it's an irony Chuck isn't it that whenever something comes up around here, you got your nose involved in everything that Thune does.
Your a city puppet.

11:11 AM  
Anonymous Ward 3 TruthtoTell Video said...

Thanks Chuck Bobby deletes my posts 256 Spring St. Schanno' Address I will file Election Complaints vs. Schanno is I have the Mendato Address
Thune and Sharon are the only ones to own Homes in St.Paul,
TruthtoTell Ward 3 Video

3:13 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Sharon you have how many blogs? You should know by now that blogger has a spam feature that automatically and indiscriminately deletes comments it determines to be spam. I didn't delete your comment until it hit the spam folder and I wouldn't of deleted it then either if I had known you had a comment there. Next time email me if you feel I deleted your comment.

I like you Sharon, however I am amused you would even bring this issue up when you are a candidate for ward 2 and you don't even live in ward 2. You live in Bostrom's ward, why not run against Bostrom?

8:17 AM  
Anonymous Sharon4SeniorsWard2 said...

Bobby WHY do you publish False Info re: Sharon's Legal Residence?

Bostrom may lose as the Hong Relator Bee XX will Win
Sharon's latest SlideShare

7:26 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Sharon, one thing I am not at my age is a liar. of coarse you know that. Anyone who knows politics in Saint Paul, KNOWS you live on the east side.

Your once upon a time home at 1058 Summit isn't your home anymore, I am sure the people who own it now claim the residence as their legal residence. I don't think they appreciate sharing this status with you.

9:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sharon you don't live on Summit anymore. STOP saying you do when you don't.

10:52 PM  
Blogger Vote Schanno said...

This is humorous... you guys need to get your facts straight.

11:42 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

"We are on a truth seeking mission"

OK my info is a little off. Sharon lives in ward 7 not 6. She should be running against Kathy Lantry.

I have pondered why Dave has never over the years contested Sharon running in ward 2. I personally believe Sharon running in wards 2 benefits Dave.

Dave has a strong voter base, when perennial candidates like Sharon run against him all it does is siphon votes away from other candidates in ward 2 who might have a chance of beating Dave.

Do you find that humorous?

8:56 AM  
Anonymous Map ward 2 said...

Link above

Surrey street where Sharon lives is not in ward 2.

9:08 AM  
Anonymous Sharon1058SummitFeeSimpleAbsolute said...

Bobby you have never applied the Rule of Law to your fantsy statements.
Sharon is facing a felony is Sharon and her Deceased Tenants in Common are not the Fee Owner in Simple absolute at 1058 Summit.
Please seize and desist your False Statements

12:58 PM  
Anonymous Sharon vs. Thune 1991Elections said...

Bobby SPAAR ie: John Periard never interviewed Sharon or others, techinally the Endorsement may be invalid: Why I waste my time and talent on this Blog is Questionable.

However Thune and Sharon are the only Homeowners in the Ward 2 Race.

1:02 PM  
Anonymous Sharon on YouTube said...

Surrey Avenue fire dept. response

Fireman said "whats that?"

Sharon "It's a camera"

Sharon "I live next door"

1:32 PM  
Anonymous Immediate release said...


Saint Paul, Minnesota (October 20th, 2011)


"There have been 300 more burglaries compared to this time last year," said Ward 2 candidate for Saint Paul City Council Cynthia Schanno, "yet 16-year incumbent Dave Thune sees nothing wrong with this." Schanno made her remarks in the face of rising crime statistics in Ward 2 and throughout the City of Saint Paul generally.

"People are entitled to a decent level of protection from the City to which they pay so many taxes," Schanno said. "I will focus on both crime prevention and prosecution when I am on the City Council." The rising crime rate has left Schanno "shocked" at what she claimed was Dave Thune's indifference to the problem. "This is a serious issue yet Mr. Thune has little or nothing to say about it," Schanno noted. "In fact, at this week's Candidate Forum he essentially admitted he was running for his last term in order to pad his pension. This is both a disgrace and a disservice to the people of Ward 2 who deserve much better."

Schanno has repeatedly emphasized the overall economic climate of Saint Paul and the need to eliminate job-killing regulations and an entrenched hostility to the private sector. "Certainly there is a correlation between economic decline and crime. I have long said that we need to make Saint Paul a welcoming place for job creators," Schanno observed, adding that "indifference in the face of escalating crime sends the wrong message at the wrong time. Career politicians looking out only for their own interests contribute to our decline. I'm here to serve notice that a new day is dawning for Ward 2."

Schanno said that she would work vigorously with local public safety officers to more fully understand the reasons for the recent increase and in fashioning the most effective responses to it.

"We can't wait," Schanno said, "we have already waited too long to face this problem head on. I will be deeply engaged on improving public safety from the first day I am on the City Council."

To learn more about Cynthia and her message please go to

10:31 AM  
Anonymous USSC 10-1032 Disparate Impact said...

Candidate Sharon Anderson was NEVER Interviewed by SPAAR_
DEmands Schanno produce her Property Tax Statement or Condo Arrangments.
Apparantly Schanno who has lived at 256 Spring for 9 months from her Home in Mendota now 256 Spring St.a huge Apt Complex has made a DEAL 0r is a Sweetheart of the Realators????
who have not ENDORSED the LandLords vs. Magner USSC: 10-1032

Apparantly Schanno is Divorced What was her Married Name ? This Single apparantly Divorced Woman may have more "Baggage" or is a Carpet Bagger from Mendato

Please track the USSC:10-1032 as Spaar has been given Tax Breaks,Loans for the Winnepig Developmemt on Rice St. Carter's or Helgens Area

9:39 AM  
Anonymous Ward 2 Video's said...

Ward 2 Candidate Video
Make your own choice Sharon's hair was unruly, Sorry about that the Bathroom was not opened.

12:53 PM  
Anonymous Residence vs. Ownership SharonScarrellaAnderson said...

Bobby Title to RealEstate is not where you Live but What you OWN.
697 Surrey is owned by my Deceased 2nd Husband Cpl James Anderson.
Until such time as these Corrupt Judges have Quiet Title "Orders" on RealEstate Sharon Scarrella Anderson with her Deceased Tenants in Common her Parents Wm.O and B ernice A. Peterson own in Fee Simple Absolute 1058 Summit.

Why do you think e-Dem suspended Sharon because Sharon had to many Forensic Files still online.

1:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting reading Sharon or should I say Rev. Sharon Anderson.

You tried getting out of paying your "Fair Share" in property taxes by claiming your home on Summit Ave. a so called church and thus exempt from property taxes. Nice try, how did that work out for you?

I wonder if the new owners of your home have "church services" at your old address.

What a scam and you are running for city council?


8:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:33 p.m. you have no proof Sharon was trying to claim her home as church exempt status. Matter of fact, your refusing to post your name to your post shows the extent of your credibility.
Either put up or shut up .

11:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When you look at all the housing shutdowns and corrupt DSI involvement under the Thune administration, why should we
re-elect Thune as a career council person ? It's time for you to go Thune. You offer no new ideas for St.Paul.

12:35 PM  
Anonymous 256Spring#113_Schanno said...

Please check Schanno's Tax Records at 256 Spring value 400 thous with full homestead Apt. 113

Where does Schanno get her Money and does she pay fair share property and income taxes?

1:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:02 AM, I should say Rev Sharon Anderson.

Your own documents list you as the Rev. Sharon Anderson and your church address, as your old Summit Avenue address.

If you would like to see for yourself, here is the link you provided us. The documents you sent us a link to clearly point out all of this information.

Why don't I leave my name? The reason is simple, you would just sue me like you have hundreds of others for telling the truth. The courts are filled with your lawsuits.

So Rev. Sharon Anderson what do you have to say now?

7:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That doesn't mean Sharon actually filed for exemption status. The link you gave was broken anyways but a pdf document is not the same as a formal application for Church exemption status.

Your a boofer 7:15 p.m.

9:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

7:15 is probably Eric Mitchell. You can't see his face in the dark and you can't see his name in his post. Whats the difference ? None !!!!!!

9:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You got Sharon mixed up with Nancy Lazeryan.

12:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So Sharon, since if elected you would have to vote on city budgets. Please tell the folks here just how you lost your home at 1058 Summit? If you want to be trusted with taxpayer dollars, why should I vote for you when you are a poor money manager.

2:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's easy, Sharon lost her home to the very people that are being sued in Federal District Court. Those clowns are the very thieves that the poster at 2:07 a.m. voted for. Now how is that for people you can trust ? Thats not saying much for the poster at 2:07 a.m. cutting on Sharon now is it !

8:20 AM  
Blogger Sharon 4Anderson said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

1:10 PM  
Blogger Vote Schanno said...


7:33 PM  
Blogger Vote Schanno said...

Sharon: What is your beef with Ms. Schanno. The women who owns free and clear her home in Ward 2? Seriously, we would like to know.

7:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Shanno is just another politician who will come in and rather than take care of the problem she'll want to blame someone or some business. Politicians never fix anything they just find scapegoats.

2:16 AM  
Blogger Vote Schanno said...

If that's what you believe... then you don't know Ms. Schanno. The city could not have a better ambassador! Saint Paul would be luck to have her represent Ward 2!

6:26 PM  
Blogger Sharon 4Anderson said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sharon it is YOU who brought up the topic. It is you who filed for office in a ward you DON'T live in.

It is YOU who didn't pay your taxes and thus lost your home at 1058 Summit.

Are you now going to sue ME for telling the TRUTH?

9:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh Sharon how has Bob extorted money from you?

That is the first question any judge would say.

I don't know how you can file these lawsuits and still be a free woman? Isn't there a part of our that guards against frivolous lawsuits?

Swiftee do you have an answer?

9:35 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bob, since we are on a truth seeking mission, please don't take this down, as it speaks for volumes about Sharon and what she is doing.

I will be filing an official complaint on Monday about Sharon's residency issue.

And Sharon I am not a candidate, I am just a concerned citizen who is fed-up with all of the BS you have been pulling over the years. This has to stop.

9:39 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home