DISCUSSIONS ON POLITICS, CIVIL RIGHTS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND ANYTHING THAT TICKLES OUR FANCY "HOST BOB JOHNSON" CONTACT Us at A_DEMOCRACY@YAHOO.COM Please stay on topic and no personal attacks.
posted by Bob at Sunday, September 07, 2008
A DEMOCRACY TOWN HALL HOME
Do you have a topic you want to discuss at the Town Hall? Email your request to A_Democracy@yahoo.com
“A DEMOCRACY” Disclaimer- While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to this forum express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable.
You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned
THE ROOF GUYS
Mickey's Diner 1950 7th Street West, St Paul, MN
(651) 698-8387
AX-MAN SURPLUS
1639 University Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55104
Tel:(651)646-8653
LANDLORD.COM LINK HERE
SHHHH! While we listen to words of wisdom from a wise man.
Conscience is the light of the Soul that burns within the chambers of our psychological heart. It is as real as life is. It raises the voice in protest whenever anything is thought of or done contrary to the righteousness. Conscience is a form of truth that has been transferred through our genetic stock in the form of the knowledge of our own acts and feelings as right or wrong. A virtuous and courageous person can alone use the instrument of conscience. He or she can alone hear the inner voice of the soul clearly. In a wicked person this faculty is absent. The sensitive nature of his / her conscience has been destroyed by sin or corruption. Hence he or she is unable to discriminate right from wrong. Those who are leading organizations, business enterprises, institutions and governments should develop this virtue of the ability to use their own conscience. This wisdom of using the clean conscience will enable them to enjoy the freedom.
Dr APJ Kalam, President of India given during the inauguration of the seminar on “THE EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION ON GOOD GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
11 Comments:
Dawkins states, “A problem property is best defined by simply saying: If you live next door to a problem property you know it! Constant calls to get rid of the junk, intolerable behavior by occupants and guests, etc. A problem property can be a rental property or an owner occupied property; it can be a commercial property or a residential property; it can be a single-family unit, a duplex or an apartment building.”
The official approved Dawkins-Kelly policy was that if landlord had one property labeled a “problem property” Defendants could target all of that landlord’s rental properties and could apply Mayor Kelly’s heightened “code to the max” and “call everything” code standard. The net effect of Dawkins’ policy was that the City was able to multiple the “code to the max” punishment to the landlord’s other properties where innocent protected class tenants lived. One tenant misbehaved, all the tenants of the targeted landlord suffered the consequences of a now weakened landlord who was too busy fighting the City to meet the critical housing needs of protected class members.
Caty Royce provided a good example of how dangerous Dawkins really was at the helm of the City’s Code Enforcement where a disabled woman was forced from her duplex unit due to an unrelated tenant’s alleged behavior in the separate unit.. Royce, pp. 41-42.
Dawkins notes show repeated instructions to inspectors to “get inside”, “try to get
Case 0:05-cv-00461-JNE-SRN Document 237 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 43 of 78
44
inside, code to the max”; “Code to the max; “Do code to the max to help eviction”,; “Try to get to VB Cat. II for code compliance.”
NHPI Director Dawkins’ notes state, “Want to check inside”“Not many code issues on exterior. Inside is a question.”“How get inside?” “inspector is trying to get inside to see if there are interior issues.”
This doesn't sound like they're responding to complaints to me. What it sounds like is that they are out to get people and working very hard at it.
I can only hope Dawkins and his henchmen end up in jail where they belong. What goes around comes around..
I love this stuff.
They quote Dawkins as saying you would know a problem property if you lived next to one, and then the plaintiff makes up a policy that has absolutely nothing to do with the sentence that they quoted.
This is the entire case. They make up conclutions with no evidence.
The plaintiffs pull shit like this out of their ass "punishment to the landlord’s other properties where innocent protected class tenants lived.." with no evidence to support it and think that the court is going to buy this garbage as some kind of legal arguement.
Its over folks.
JMONTOMEPPOF
Chuck Repke
Chuck whats the matter isn't Gloria around to help you with your spelling and grammar?
They make up conclutions (conclusions) with no evidence.
Grandiousity ain't (isn't) it great?
Anonymous said...
Chuck whats the matter isn't Gloria around to help you with your spelling and grammar?
They make up conclutions (conclusions) with no evidence.
Grandiousity ain't (isn't) it great?
9:34 PM
we don't cut on people for grammer and spelling around here.
10:04 we do if they think they know it all.
No we don't. If you have a legitimate beef with Repke, then rip him apart. If it's spelling, then sally on over to some school somewhere and mentor some kids. This isn't a continuing ed class.
Think again. There is plenty of evidence to back up what the plaintiff's say. And plenty of non plaintiff witnesses.
Well, that was nice to have people that generally hate me standing up for me.
Thanks.
Yes, I think much faster than I type and I hit send keys without checking for spelling errors. I keep forgetting that this little box that I type in doesn't have an automatic spell check (red underline) and I have to reread it on my own.
So conclusion was a misspelling, but, "Grandiosity, ain't it great?" was intentional. "Ain't it great" just sounds so much cockier than, "isn't it great."
And, why did you pull the quote over here instead of where it happened?
JMONTOMEPPOF
Chuck Repke
People don't hate you CHuck they just think a little misguided and they're preping you to be "Hanitized!"
Post a Comment
<< Home