DIVA UPDATE
Please click onto the title of this post to get a link to another Pioneer Press story concerning this subject. You won't believe it!
DISCUSSIONS ON POLITICS, CIVIL RIGHTS, PROPERTY RIGHTS, AND ANYTHING THAT TICKLES OUR FANCY "HOST BOB JOHNSON" CONTACT Us at A_DEMOCRACY@YAHOO.COM Please stay on topic and no personal attacks.
posted by Bob at Wednesday, November 15, 2006
On A Truth Seeking Mission A Democracy
The Black Background Represents The Dark Subjects We Debate - The White Print Represents The Pure And Simple Truth
*****YA ALL COME BACK NOW YA HEAR*****
6 Comments:
Deb Johnson hasn't researched her choice of an attorney very well.
DAWKINS!!! I can see it now, Dawkins and the City attorney negotiating a settlement.
That's like 2 wolves and a rabbit (Deb Johnson) deciding what they are going to have for supper.
I also was shocked when I read about Dawkins being the attorney, but if you think about it Dawkins also knows first hands what the city will do next....if he is trying to build a name for himself as an attorney he could be the perfect one to hire.....remember he will know every angle the city will attempt to lie about and cheat you on...from his own little book of rules he set forth..
Nancy (formerly of St.Paul)
What's this piece of shit Dawkins worried about evidence now for? He didn't have to have any evidence when he worked for the city, he just had the idea that the "ends justifies the means." I can't wait to watch the City Ocuncil meeting on this one!
Dawkins on one hand fights against the city and on the other hand the city defends him in these RICO lawsuits.Didn't Dawkins fight against so called problem properties for the city.I'm really confused.This city needs to be gutted and new leaders added.
what?
"This city needs to be gutted and new leaders added."
Becuase a formal city official went back to private practice. I admit the irony of the situation, no doubt. BUt to paint Deb as an innocent victim here is laughable at best....
I didn't take irony as the main idea of the post above. because the city is confused about who it works for, disruptive to the average hard-working person who owns property in the city and is reckless with their judgment. That is the main idea here and why they need new leadership, ideas, practices, logic and plans. They don't know what they are doing with the power that they have been given and they are all on a trip!
Ironic to say the least. But I bet those who have felt the wrath of the city under Dawkins command would have another name for it.
Post a Comment
<< Home