Custom Search

Friday, November 30, 2007

City of Saint Paul takes the low road in obstructing Nancy Lazaryan's investigation into city corruption.

Please click onto the COMMENTS for the story.


Blogger Bob said...


Nancy Lazaryan has been inspecting the vacant building files at the City of St. Paul. It took over a month of pressuring the City to even begin to see these files. It is well established that public data can be viewed at any time during "normal business hours"...8:00 AM to 4:30PM, Mon. - Fri. The City of St. Paul had limited the time that Lazaryan could have access to inspect the public data. After "negotiations", it was agreed that Lazaryan would have access to the files every Wednesday from 8:30 AM to 4:30 PM. Two weeks ago Lazaryan arrived at the City on a Wednesday to inspect the data. She was told that it was not available because she had not called ahead of time to say exactly when she would be arriving. After Lazaryan made a "fuss", the City produced the data for inspection.

Robert Humphrey then sent a series of emails to Lazaryan, establishing a "protocol" that Lazaryan would need to call 48 hours in advance to tell the City the exact time she would be arriving on each Wednesday.

Robert Humphrey is not the Responsible Authority for the City of St. Paul. Robert Humphrey is not a "designee" for the Responsible Authority of St. Paul. Robert Humphrey was violating the law by establishing this "protocol".

This week, Lazaryan appeared at the City offices at approximately 2 PM on Wednesday to inspect the data. She came with a TV camera and camera person. She asked to see the data. Robert Humphrey came to the elevator lobby, and denied Lazaryan access to the data. Lazaryan informed Humphrey that he was violating the law and placed him under Citizen's Arrest.

Lazaryan immediately called the St. Paul police and informed them of the situation and asked for assistance; for the police to take custody of the person that she had arrested. During the phone call to the police, Humphrey attempted to flee, and Lazaryan pursued.

Lazaryan cornered Humphrey in a back office and waited for the police to arrive. Upon the arrival of the police, Lazaryan asked the police to take custody of Humphrey, and to give her a "Citizen's Arrest Form" to fill out. The police told Lazaryan that the form was in the squad car and that Lazaryan was to follow the officer to the car to get the form. Lazaryan, with TV camera rolling, followed the officer. Upon reaching the squad car, the officer refused to give Lazaryan the Citizen's Arrest form, and told Lazaryan if she returned to the City offices, she would be charged with trespassing.

Lazaryan then went to the St. Paul Police headquarters, with the TV camera person. She asked to speak with the Chief. Instead of the Chief, Sgt. Burke spoke with Lazaryan. With TV cameras rolling, Lazaryan told Burke that the officers needed to be investigated for misconduct because they refused to do their duty by refusing to take custody of Humphrey.

At around 4:00 PM Sgt. Burke called Lazaryan and tried to "explain away" the actions of Humphrey. Lazaryan told Burke that a Citizen's Arrest had been made, and that the officers had the duty to take Humphrey. Lazaryan asked for a formal investigation of the officers' misconduct. Burke asked Lazaryan to return to the police station and to meet with a special investigator.

Lazaryan returned to the police station, this time without the camera person. Lazaryan was immediately met in the lobby by one of the officers that Lazaryan was accusing of misconduct. Lazaryan objected to going with this officer, but was told another officer was going to take Lazaryan's complaint. While Lazaryan was giving details of her complaint to the "investigator", Sgt. Burke called Lazaryan on her cell phone, asking when she would be getting to the police station. Lazaryan told Burke that she was already talking with an "investigator", and was concerned that the officer that Lazaryan was complaining about was present while Lazaryan was making her complaint. Shortly thereafter, Lazaryan attempted to leave, frustrated that the "investigator" was not making any notes.

Lazaryan called a friend on her cell phone, concerned at what was transpiring. As she attempted to leave she was "bum rushed" by several officers. Lazaryan asked if she was under arrest, and was told she was not under arrest. She then insisted that she could leave. The officers forced her back into the "interview room" and ordered that she end her cell phone conversation. Moments later they cuffed Lazaryan and took her to jail. Lazaryan asked to immediately be taken to a judge, which is her right. The police refused.

After spending the night in jail, Lazaryan appeared before the judge. The city attorney tried to get the judge to order a psychological exam of Lazaryan. The judge questioned Lazaryan and then denied the exam. The judge placed a "no contact" order on Lazaryan and released her, without bail. The judge also ordered that the City would provide Lazaryan with the data that she had been seeking.

On Thursday, after being released from jail, Lazaryan contacted Sgt. Burke. She left a message, stating that she did not appreciate the treatment by the St. Paul police, since Lazaryan had come in, at Burke's request, to make a complaint against the police for misconduct.

At almost 5:00 PM on Thursday Sgt. Burke called Lazaryan back and told her that he had no idea the "corrupt" officers had hijacked Lazaryan and arrested her. Burke asked that Lazaryan come back to the police station and talk with Internal Affairs. Lazaryan insisted on a meeting with the Chief, and that if the Chief did not clean up the corruption in the police department, that the St. Paul police will be feeling the full force and power of the Citizens upon them.

The Chief was not in the office on Friday, and will be getting this message on Monday.

The events that the camera person taped were aired on "Inside Insight" Wednesday evening, while Lazaryan was in jail. This tape will be available for posting on the blog.

11:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is how the city deals with people who attempt to uncover the corruption.

7:49 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thats is some dirty rotten tactics that they used on Nancy. Even though Nancy had to go through a lot with this incident (and other incidents) it will or should in the end play a role in helping to prove the corrupt behavior of SOME officials.

8:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

8:27, I agree it is SOME officials.

There are certainly people in the city government that know better. However, these SOME officials have power. The rotten apples have already spoiled part of the barrel and are continuing to do more harm.

9:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let me express my disappointment with Robert Humphrey.

On my house situation which resulted in Compliance Inspection requirements, there were indications of MISCONDUCT by a city official. The City Council representative refused to meet with me to discuss it.

As a logical and professional next step, my father, Glenn Gausman, approached high level building official Robert Humphrey, and asked for his assistance. My father furnished Mr. Humphrey with proof of the 1993 electrical permit which was signed by an electrical inspector and contained a permit number. Having served on the City of St. Paul's Board of Housing Appeals for nine years, my father thought things were being improperly handled.

Mr. Humphrey chose to publicly berate my father, yelling that I could burn down the entire neighborhood!

I subsequently found further proof of the permit, including checks and the contractor's proposal. Responsibility does not rest with me because I had the proper permit done under city inspection. In the past, the electrical work (including the contractor's mistake) would have simply been consided a work in progress. Also, many things were substandard on Selby Avenue in 1993, because of overwhelming inner-city problems. I would certainly hope that the City would be willing to work with people under the circumstances.

Mr. Humphrey, my father acted completely appropriately and professionally, despite the fact he was seriously ill with termial cancer. I find your conduct extremely insensitive and unprofessional.

Robert Gausman

11:54 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the end they are all gonna fall and they'll fall hard. There are too many people after them for this to go away now. All it is going to do is grow and grow until it's out of control and the city is bankrupt. That will be your legacy Ms Lantry.

12:02 PM  
Anonymous henry said...

I think the Feds should step in and get involved.

12:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


For the purpose of accuracy, I am relying on my father's report of his treatment by Mr. Humphrey, and I believe that Mr. Humphrey was unprofessional and insensitive.

R. Gausman

1:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What the hells a matter with you Sharon? This thread is not about you or your rantings, it's about Nancy getting arrested. What are you gonna do, try and take over the blog and wreck it like Dahn did before we got rid of him. Stay on your own blog.

5:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I spoke with my mother regarding Robert Humphrey. She vividly recalled Mr. Humphrey berating my father. However it was not public, as I reported earlier, but over the phone, so I was in error on that point.

My mother said Mr. Humphrey comments left my father shocked, hurt, and betrayed.

This goes far beyond abysmal human relations and professionalism. As a high level building official, why didn't Mr. Humphrey report that I had the proper permit? Why didn't he stop subsequent mistreatment of my family and me? (see June 30 complaint).

Does this high level official have a significant role in the cases involving RICO and Civil Rights violations?

R. Gausman

7:37 PM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

9:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

We do all realize how insane this is. You can't do a citizens arrest on every city employee that you don't believe is doing their job which is what Nancy thinks (in her world) she was doing.

In the real world, Nancy assaulted Mr Humphry by grabbing him and holding on to him. She is lucky he didn't press assault charges.

Honest, no matter how what you think you can not assault City employees in their office because you disagree with how they are doing ther job.

Humphry is the deputy director of the department and probably has the authority to determine a schedule for access to files. Even if he doesn't you can't put your hands on him Nancy!


Chuck Repke

10:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

chuck you are wrong. we pay him.
He needs to treat evertone with respect and just turn over the
flies. Do not put conditions on it.

He is city employee that is all I have say.

Chuck must got inform by your pal dave.

Just grow up. I have waited for four weeks for information from the city. They just don't turn
over information that is damages to them or their programs.

Ok chuck How much Money do you get from the city and how do you spend it?? Since you get money from the city. Ypou must tell that information or I will tell the council not give you money next year. Or I willl go to court and stop them. The reason behind this it my money thatr get I have right to them how and who to give to. I will say that they get about $1800.00 or more from me.

Under the law I have right to tell
how to spemd my money. And ask for information on the group or dept.
that spend my money on.

They have treat me with respectand
stop playing games. I bet you. that there will been more taxepayer asking questioins. On how the council spend their money.

Leslie K. Lucht
will start

7:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You don't know all the facts Chuck. Personally, I would like to hear the specific facts leading up to the attemped arrest as to why Nancy thinks Humphrey broke the law. So far, she seems to know the law pretty well from what I have read here. I doubt if she would leave herself open to charges by making some bogus arrest, but like I said, I'd like to hear the facts concerning it.

8:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Remember folks, Chuck has tunnel vision he only see's things the way he can best stand up for these people it is more of a self interest for Chuck. See he gets his $money$ from the city so in his mind the city could do no wrong as long as the dollars continue to flow into his so called non-profit organization aka his pocket!

8:46 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

9:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I tried to get some copies of spome records at the old NHPI office and was told I would have to see the inspector since they wer "his records." Do you think that was a violation of the law Nancy? I finally just gave up and forgot about it and never did get them.

12:26 PM  
Blogger Sharon Anderson said...

If We can assist anyone,who is illegally jailed as My mother Bernice A Peterson 1983Mayoral Candidate, on my property at 2194 Marshall No Statute of Limitations on Fraud eleted SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS Bobby I've deleted most post as I am not going to fight with Repke at this time

3.732 Settlement of claims.

3.735 Inactive.

3.736 Tort claims.

12:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


This is interesting about Robert Humphrey.

How is he involved in the RICO lawsuits?

If I remember correctly, Robert Kessler and former candidate for mayor was also served with papers. How is he involved in the RICO lawsuits?

Bob, this just gets more interesting.

6:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems as if Humohrey is joining the conspiracy if he is now doing Kesslers bidding for him. Smart guy that Kessler guy, he sticks the dirty work off on Humohrey so he takes the fall for it.

6:51 PM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

11:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Read the section again on citizen's arrest. It is designed to give authority to a citizen to make an arrest of someone clearly committing a crime, a robery, a theft, something where there is visual evidence.

"(1) for a public offense committed or attempted in the arresting person's presence;
(2) when the person arrested has committed a felony, although not in the arresting person's
presence; or
(3) when a felony has in fact been committed, and the arresting person has reasonable cause
for believing the person arrested to have committed it."

Nancy didn't "see" Mr Humphrey do anything that would be a "public offence" and he did not commit a felony because as Namcy quoted the offence she is alledging carries a penalty of less than or up to a year in jail. Nancy may believe in "her mind" that Humphrey committed an offence, but she didn't see him commit an offence. There is no physical event to be seen, so there is no "public offence."

So, what we have here is a nut case showed up at a City office, she physically assaults a City employee, he flees, she follows him. The police convince her to leave the building and inform her that she should stop it. She continues her tirade at the police station. They put her into custody and place a restraining order on her to stay away from City office.

I assume the next we here of this will be the next time Nancy gets thrown in jail for violating the restraining order.

As to any of the stuff on me you can take a look at any of my contracts with the City at City Hall and they spell out every dime I get. All of the work that either of the agencies that I work with that have contracts with get monies as reimbursements for expenses. So, there is a paper trail for every penny. My life is an open book and if you don't think that I don't know that you ass holes already haven't been looking at my contracts, you'd have to think I was an idiot. I have been standing up to you bullies for a long time.


Chuck Repke

8:45 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

9:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The conspracy is widening Repke and your just trying to divert the attention by talking your bogus contracts and all the asshole looking at them. Your a small fish buddy.....a nothing. People are after the real conspiraotrs, not you.

9:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Nancy, Nancy, Nancy, you didn't witness anything you determind in your mind that certain actions that might be interpretted by a court as being something. You can't do a citizens arrest for that.

In Nancy's world anytime I went past a place where City employees were working and I saw someone leaning on their shovel I could determine that I had just "witnessed them failing to perform theit duties," and have them arrested.

Oh, sure Nancy, keep dreaming things are going to work out your way.

And 9:24 they have a special on tin foil at Cub this week.


Chuck Repke

9:49 AM  
Blogger Sharon Anderson said... Forensic records obtained for 20 years
In this case Chuck Repke is not a public official, to slander his good name is unethical, Thanks for standing up to whomever
Millions of blogs out there, In fact SharonScarrellaAnderson now has 68 blogs, Its an HONOR to be Sanctioned from chilling Free Speech, Nancy the records are with the persons, I have all mine for the past 30 years. Just got another from defendant Joel Essling for $70.00 excessive consumption MAIL FRAUD, Your arrest appears questionable?
FURTHER is now in the Legislative Branch, Humphrey is in the Executive Branch re: Separation of Powers Doctrine: PS We were sued for Practicing Law 30 years ago Whatever that is, Be Careful of these Pscy Examns Sharon has had over 12, the only Certified Sane Candidate for Any Public Office
This Blog is getting Boring with your personal attacks Delete if you want The Truth is out there
Persons in Glass House throwing Stones are Reprehensible

9:59 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

11:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The only thing boring about htis blog Sharon is you and your rantings. If you have 30 other blogs, why don't you stay on them ionstead of coming here with your Bullshit that no one wants to see?

1:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is this blog being run from some insaneasylum somewhere?

4:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

4:02 pm, do you have a googles tool bar? This blog has one of the HIGHEST "googles rankings" in the entire world... so who's the idiot, you or googles....

Check out the Pioneer Press and Tribunes "googles ranking". This blog is rated 35 to 45% higher than our local main stream news papers. Shove that where the sun don't shine.

Bob, you have gut's my man.. Keep serving up the gruel for the city to eat. Thanks for all you do.

10:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

10:34 continued- oh and another thing, Sharon, you suffer from "blog envy". If you didn't you would be pre-occupied with those 68 blogs you have. Instead you continually come here desparately seeking attention from the traffic at this blog because your blogs are like grave yards. DEAD!

10:56 PM  
Blogger Sharon Anderson said...

Forensic Evidence is NOT blog envy,Apparantly you have not even read the 68 Blogs, now its 69 or 70
used re: Title 26 501(c)3 for educational purposes:
Its illegal to entrap the city or State"but for" Sharon applyed for 2nd Judicial Judge(Dickinson) Seat the city is simulating legal ??process to jail NancyLazaryan because she is lobbying HF1261 is bizzare,
You bet we'll be on the Ballot 2008 Ha Ha Legal Way to FOIA the State for records: challenge constitutionality, "Learned in the Law" has NEVER been defined by the Legislature
PS Public Works listed on the back of each and every Notice's 651-266-8858 submits False internal documents from Kessler's Office via defendant joel essling for City Council Ratification Sharon is entrapping the City for Extortion? PSS City has wilfully failed to properly serve my Dead Husband: Follow the Money

9:18 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

12:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Read your 68 blogs????????

Would I be too polite if I just asked if you are a f---ing nutball or what? You can't stand to read through even 1 of your posts Sharon because you are all over the place. You don't make any damn sense with anything you say. Why don't you try to get focused and stay there once in a while?

3:55 PM  
Blogger Sharon Anderson said...

MADAM LAZARYAN: Response dtd.5Dec07

PLEASE DO NOT MISINFORM THE PUBLIC AS TO 'LEARNED IN THE LAW" Blue Book pg 262, Amendments to MN State Constitution 1952 "to clarify meaning of who can VOTE" rejected VOTING RIGHTS ACTS
Disbarred Lawyer John Graham with R kids, Your INTENT to mislead the public is not well taken by In re: Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562 which is Affiant Sharon Scarrella, now Anderson
Judges CANNOT MAKE LAWS, only the Legislature "must" make the laws
FURTHER as Sharon has electronically filed the application for 2nd Judicial District vacancy (Dickinson) Seat
re: SEPARATION OF POWERS If We non Lawyers are excluded from Judicial Offices based upon a License requirement, then that License must excluded ALL LAWYERS from the Legislative and Executive Branch's including city attorney Louise Seeba

Lazaryan you are correct on the MS13.09 However Humphrey is low man on Totem Pole.

Lazaryan you should have applied for Non Lawyer Judge WELCOME'S all background checks to prove Judicial Corruption and or Entenza WAS/IS a lawyer got dumped "Big Time Erin Murphy is accountable
The United States is constitutionally constituted federal governance for the United States of America. It is nothing more, and nothing less than a municipal service corporation, whose statutory limitations are written in black and white. Read the Constitution of the United States for the United States of America, and its forerunners, the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, and the Declaration of Independence of the thirteen United States of America
The “Courts” in America are statutory creatures of law that are legislative agencies constituted constitutionally by the legislature in conformity to the State and or Federal Constitution.
The will and whim of the legislature operating under the state and federal capitol dome is constitutionally constituted to stand within the rule of law. It is unfortunate that far too many Americans proclaim their misery is a result of the known corruption of the public weal. It is a fact, that it is the known corruption of the public weal that is instituted by the appointed political bureaucracy which will that substantiate the necessity to learn how to stand the force of law by objecting to the inequitable public policy of the administrative state that lies well in equity when the litigant has not knowledge to the law.
Google Jack-john Graham
FURTHER GO TO taken from the federal courts with Sharons ECF P-165913 Pacer Account sa1299 at 8 cents a page total 88 cents

1:56 PM  
Blogger Sharon Anderson said...


City of St. Paul would not dare jail a Candidate for Senate 25 to replace Tom Neuville now appointed Judgship
Nancy I beat Neuville for State Attorney General 1994, the Republican Party embellzed over $136,000.oo Campaign Financing due to Sharon Anderson IR Nominee

3. Special Election Called for Senate District 25

A special election will occur January 3, 2008 for State Senate District 25, an area that includes Le Sueur, Rice, Scott and Sibley counties. The special election is due to a vacancy created by the appointment of State Senator Thomas Neuville to a district court judgeship. Candidates interested in seeking the office must file an Affidavit of Candidacy with the Secretary of State's Office by December 6, 2007. Candidates withdrawing must do so by December 7, 2007. If necessary, a primary election may occur on December 18, 2007 to narrow the field of candidates to one from each major party.

4. Minnesota Precinct Caucuses February 5, 2008
Submitted re: Voting Rights Act to enforce Separation of Powers Doctrine and to force DSI to pay damages for the illegal jailing of Nancy Lazaryan

5:37 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home