Custom Search

Monday, September 04, 2006

Suburbs seek fix for aging houses

I was emailed the link to the following story from the Pioneer Press. Chief Building Inspector for Inver Grove Heights is Franklin Martin. He is married to Lisa Martin the Code Enforcement Officer in St. Paul named in Racketeering law suits against the City.

How many of you married folk out there think alot like your spouse?

Jeesh, stop it Franklin your scaring people! Please read the story and see what I'm talking about.

Suburbs seek fix for aging houses
Citing property owners has pros, cons for Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul
Pioneer Press
As the problem of dumpy-looking and poorly maintained property spreads from inner cities to aging suburbs, so does the debate over what to do about it.

Familiar arguments are resurfacing in Inver Grove Heights, which is considering whether to adopt an ordinance to enforce minimum appearance standards for homes and other property.

Franklin Martin, the suburb's chief building official, said the ordinance is needed to give officials stronger powers to eliminate nuisances such as bad roofs and siding, junk cars, unsightly storage of items, and similar eyesores. Property owners who don't comply could face citations and fines, get a bill from the city for abating the problem or, as a last resort, be taken to court.

"We do not have the tools in place to enforce maintenance provisions. Without such a provision, you can't address the issues that are of primary nuisance to neighborhoods: torn screens, broken doors, dilapidated roofing," Martin said. "Currently, there have to be building-code violations that would hamper life and public safety."

Martin said rundown properties exist "all over town" and include vacant farmhouses and collapsed barns. But the old village area, along Concord Street near the northern border with South St. Paul, appears to have a higher concentration of problems.

While the percentage of troubled properties remains low in the city of 33,000 residents, Mayor George Tourville said adoption of a nuisance-property ordinance is long overdue.

"We're not looking at kicking anybody out of their home," Tourville said. "But we need to get ahead of the problem, not behind it."

However, resistance from other members of the City Council recently derailed a proposed ordinance modeled after the one in neighboring West St. Paul.

In a City Council work session last month, member Dennis Madden and others raised objections to the adversarial tone of the draft ordinance and worried that city inspectors would be overly intrusive. Madden also objected to some of the provisions as too restrictive, such as one limiting the height of grass or weeds to eight inches.

"I want to see the ratty-looking property cleaned up, too," Madden said. "But there needs to be some sort of oversight so it's not just up to the inspector. I want the City Council involved if there's any serious move at all. If you get a real tyrant in there (as city inspector), you're going to have a real problem."

No date has been set for when an amended or scaled-back version of the proposal will surface on the council's agenda.

Martin said that, based on the experience of other cities, council members often "think worst-case scenarios" when considering such ordinances for the first time. But they usually become more comfortable when they see "how it operates and how the city uses it," he said.

Oversight and legal due process are already in place, Martin said. City inspectors are supervised by city managers, he said, while homeowners can challenge citations in Dakota County housing court.

Jim Laska, a 48-year resident, is disappointed by the slow progress in adopting a nuisance ordinance. He said he and other residents won't let the issue drop.

"It's very, very important," Laska said. "Our citizens deserve nothing less than to have an ordinance that defines standards and expectations."


The draft proposal was similar to one that has been in effect in West St. Paul for several years.

While West St. Paul formed in 1889 and Inver Grove Heights incorporated only in 1965, both have homes dating back to at least the early 20th century. Some of them obviously need repairs.

Martin is a fan of his neighboring city's ordinance and how it has been enforced.

"I think they've seen a lot of success," he said. "Neighborhoods look better."

But there's still debate among West St. Paulites about the ordinance and how it is enforced. Some think inspectors are too harsh and arbitrary. Others think they are too lax.

West St. Paul calls its inspection program PACE, an acronym for Pro-Active Code Enforcement. At one time, a city inspector went from house to house in problem neighborhoods, inspecting and issuing orders to correct violations. The worst offenders got citations if the problems weren't fixed, and some ended up in court.

Recently, however, West St. Paul has dropped aggressive enforcement and started to respond mostly to complaints — a sign of the inspection program's success, said city attorney Kori Land.

The change has rankled some residents, such as John Rapos, who wants inspectors to return to house-to-house inspections in targeted neighborhoods.

"The whole program seems like it's falling apart," Rapos said. "There's less enforcement. They're not doing code enforcement until someone brings it to their attention. The reality is most people don't say anything. A number of people are upset, those of us who have nice houses."

But even City Council members have been caught in the crosshairs of city inspectors, and at least one of them thinks the city should scrap what he considers to be an overly harsh program.

Nick Juarez, who represents one of the city's three wards on the seven-member City Council, said he was cited twice for a crumbling concrete retaining wall in front of his house, which was built in 1890.

The first citation came shortly after he bought the house in 2003. The most recent one came last week, after neighbors raised questions about whether Juarez is getting favored treatment because of his status as a council member. The city says the wall poses no safety hazard.

"If it's unsightly to people and they want me to fix it, I'll fix it," Juarez said. "I agree it's unsightly. There's some paint coming off, cinderblock has fallen away."

Rather than getting special treatment, Juarez believes he's being singled out — as are other people who have complaints lodged against them.

"I don't see the purpose of the PACE program. It's supposed to be pro-active to preserve housing stock and bring property values up," Juarez said. "But it doesn't get to all the problems in the city. I can drive up every block in the north and find problems on every single house."

Juarez also said the program doesn't take into account the modest financial means of many West St. Paul residents, including him.

"Not all politicians are rich," said Juarez, a married father of three children who works as a security guard for a Target store in St. Paul. "I'm a common guy. It comes down to priorities. Taking care of family is first. Taking care of property is second."

Juarez said he's gotten estimates of up to $15,000 to hire a contractor to build a new retaining wall. He doesn't have the money, so he will patch the wall himself.

If he has his way, Juarez said, West St. Paul will do away with the PACE inspection program and replace it with "a little softer program," such as one that uses volunteers to help low- to moderate-income people make essential repairs.

Juarez, appointed to the council in 2004 to fill a vacancy, doesn't think the condition of his retaining wall will hurt his election chances this fall.

"If that's the best they can do is go attack my retaining wall, let them attack," he said.

Brian Bonner can be reached at or 651-228-2173.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

Someone should send the City counsels of Inver grove Heights and West St. Paul a link to the Watchdog News. Maybe someone in those City governments will take the time to read the racketeering law suits against the City of St. Paul.

11:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those Citys would not care. None of them do. they know they can violate your rights any time they feel like it because no one is going to spend the money to sue them.

12:38 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They have their own inspectors, what like the bias West St.Paul inspector St.Paul called in that didn't know the difference between a screw jack and a hydralic jack. What are these inspectors gonna do when they are required to go to school and learn how to do their job? I would just love to go inspect some of their homes, inside and out!

7:20 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I forgot about Jessamine. Somewhere someone has a lot of photos of the house inside and out, icluding the infamous screw jack. Does this blog have the capability to post some of those photos? I think it would they would be very informational for the new people here to see for themselves exactly what people like Rick and the eDem crowd not only think is acceptable behavior from the city, but also the contempt they have for the class of people they percieve as being "below them".

7:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

those photos were posted on the internet back when Jessamine was being talked about. Are they still there? Can we link to them? Who knows where they are?

7:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Check with the watchdog guy. He had a structural engineer and a contractor go through Jessamine, and he also had a whole bunch of photographs that he put on his website.

1:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

He has all the dirt on the city.

1:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's actually and if you go to the front page of this site, you can click on the link. If you go to the May/June edition you can see the inspectors, who tried making off with the owners at 14 E. Jessamine's private property and an article about council members property tax rate/relief.

The March/April edition has the alleged "screwjack" pictures and other pictures of the inside of the home. It also has a story of how inspectors targeted an investment property on Carroll Avenue in St. Paul as it was being remodeled and ignored a dilapitated house across the street from it. The ignored house that had many code violations later burned and a man died. Inspectors were too busy giving right ups to the property investors. There intention was to cause financial burden upon the investors and didn't care about safety to the occupants of the building that burned. Look at the pictures, pictures don't lie. The house that they targeted is in very nice condition and a lot of time and money was being put into it. Look at the other house. Which house would you feel safer in?

4:37 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home