Custom Search

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Mortgage Company Wheeling And Dealing With City of Saint Paul Over Vacant Property

Please click onto the TITLE of this post for the city council video. (Jump to resolution 48)

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our house is a pice of junk. Tear down dan said. Last night. It will not be stand after 15 days. I told the wrencking ball is there now waiting for the 16th day. Look like the city is in a pissing match with the banks now.

You fix them NOW or we will tear them down on the 16th day.

And screw your money. We do need you to loan out money to any one.

We do not need taxprayers.

We are going to a perfect city. No problems. No need for police or courts

4:22 PM  
Anonymous Jeff Matiatos said...

Some cases you wont be disappointed in reading regarding the wrongful demolition of a condemend home(s) by the city of Minneapolis.
Minneapolis v. Meldahl 607 n.w.2d 168 at 172.

AND

Depalma v. Rosen 294 Minn. 11 or 199 n.w.2d 517 at 520.




Jeff Matiatos

7:47 PM  
Anonymous Bill Cullen said...

This is really fascinating stuff. I wonder how the city decides what comes down? If you look at pictures of the building at hand (616 Wells), it, well, has some deferred maintenance. But, item 51 plans to demolish 651 Hawthorne. That building looks very nice...

Nancy, what encouraged you to speak on item 51?

Bill Cullen.

8:43 PM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

Bill,
It was the first building up for demo that had no one their to defend against the City.

I had a camera person there and we were able to get on film what the council video fails to show. We are working on getting it on the web, right now.

I'll get the link to Bob the minute it is sent to me.

Nancy Lazaryan

9:45 PM  
Anonymous danno of maplewood said...

I too am interested to see what happened regarding item 51. first, what set off Lantry? second, nancy why waste your efforts when the recommendation was to table the matter? it would seem that any of the several addresses following would have been a better platform for whatever you were planning...

danno of maplewood

9:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I thought you got 30 days Nancy. Damn revolving door justice system.

10:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Lantry thinks she's a queen and all yo have to do is question her and she goes off. She's another "entitlement crowd" jerk.

11:17 PM  
Anonymous Mpls v. Meldahl 607 nw2d168pg172 said...

Hey Jeff, Thanks for Case Law,
When posting go to Google, then post to the URL


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Minneapolis+v.+Meldahl+607+n.w.2d+168+at+172.&btnG=Google+Search

6:23 AM  
Anonymous Open Meeting Law MS13 said...

The Law is the Law, Lantrys Intent with Libel mandates

https://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/getpub.php?pubtype=STAT_CHAP_SEC&year=2007&section=13D.06

7:15 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey,

Let the city rear down All the homes and kick everyone out of the city.

Let see who pays the taxes.

1:45 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home