Custom Search

Thursday, March 27, 2008

A final warning! by Nancy Lazaryan

Please click onto the COMMENTS for the story.


Blogger Bob said...

I deleted Nancy's phone number and Address

To the Governing Body of Maplewood, Minnesota
When I spoke to the Maplewood City Council on March 23, 2008 I informed the council of the
events and results of the criminal trial against me, which was brought by Maplewood.
Repeatedly, I have appeared before the council and made my demand that the elected officials of
Maplewood abide by their oaths of office and uphold our constitutions.
This letter is my final warning to the government of Maplewood, Minnesota. The following
violations of the state and federal constitutions will cease, or the People of Maplewood will bring
a federal RICO action and by federal authority seek the remedy of dissolving the artificial entity
known as the City of Maplewood, Minnesota.
Regarding the Citizens at large in Maplewood and the state of Minnesota:
1. On March 23, 2008 the council passed the first reading of amendment to the
watershed ordinance. This was done in spite of the fact that those members of the
public that would be directly impacted by the change in the ordinance where not
properly noticed. Notice after the passing of the first reading, by letter to these
Citizens, does not constitute proper notice and thereby violates due process.
2. As testified to by a Maplewood police officer under oath in the Ramsey county
district court, the police policy in Maplewood is to require Citizens to falsify
police reports, and if the Citizen refuses, the police will not investigate the
complaint of the Citizen. This is a violation of due process and abuse of power.
3. Maplewood has abused the police power and the power of the courts by
retaliating against Citizens and members of the media that have sought public data
and to expose the corruption within the government of Maplewood.
4. Upon knowledge of the repeated abuses by the Maplewood police in violating the
rights of the Citizens, the governing body has not taken action to stop these
abuses. This failure to act is misconduct in office.
5. Maplewood has failed to produce the public data demanded by numerous
Citizens, on multiple occasions. This failure is misconduct in office and violates
M.S. Chapter 13.
6. Certain members of the Maplewood city council are attempting to restrict the
right of the people of the state of Minnesota from petitioning the council during
the public comment section of the council meetings. Maplewood is a political
subdivision of the state of Minnesota and receives monies from the Citizens of the
state of Minnesota. These actions violate the federally secured right to petition the
7. Councilmember Junemann has repeatedly left her office by removing herself from
the council room during the times that Citizens have petitioned the governing
body during council meetings when the Citizens were exposing the malfeasances
of the Maplewood employees and council members. These actions by Junemann
constitute open defiance of duties required of her in her office as an elected public
8. Councilmember John Nephew, prior to his taking office, contacted the League of
Minnesota Cities and sought legal advice concerning matters involving the
governing of Maplewood. His actions were criminal, in that he was
impersonating a public official. Nephew openly admitted to these actions at a
Maplewood city council meeting, and he was never charged for his criminal
9. In spite of the evidence of Agent Orange, Silvex and other toxic chemicals being
present at the Beam Avenue Compost site, the governing body of Maplewood has
refused to require the site to be cleaned up. These actions constitute malfeasances
in office and violations of our state and federal constitutions, in that the
government has been established by the People to secure our safety.
10. In spite of the evidence of the hazard to the health of the Citizens of composting
materials, the governing body of Maplewood has allowed X-Cel Energy to create
a site that contains wood chips, which are an even greater hazard than mere
composting materials. This was done over protests of the Citizens. Again, these
actions are violations of the state and federal constitutions.
11. A Citizen in southern Maplewood was almost killed by the malfeasances of the
governing body of Maplewood and/or its employees directing that toxic chemicals
to be dumped into her yard. No investigation was made into this incident. These
actions are egregious and rise to the level of treason.
12. The city employees, including supervisors, have created a union. This action is an
affront to the Citizens of Maplewood, as it has been repeatedly held by the U.S.
and Minnesota Supreme courts that government employment is privileged.
Thereby, the employees of the artificial entity known as the City of Maplewood
do not have the right to unionize, which is a right secured for private citizens
employed by private employers. These actions by the employees of Maplewood
violate the Rule of Jurisdiction under Natural Law.
13. In spite of the City of Maplewood being over $60 million in debt, the City refuses
to operate in a fiscally responsible manner. The City pays employees up to twice
what is paid in the private sector and is now attempting to create new positions
that are unnecessary and an additional tax burden upon the Citizens of both
Maplewood and the state of Minnesota.
Regarding myself and my family:
1. Chad Lemmons is not authorized by law to represent the City of Maplewood in
the quiet title action against my family. This is a violation of due process.
2. The City of Maplewood has not authorized by resolution the slander of title action
against me. This is a violation of due process.
3. The employees and/or elected officials of Maplewood conspired to falsely charge
me. These actions constitute criminal actions under the federal RICO statutes and
violate the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution.
4. The Maplewood police manipulated a Citizen into falsifying a Citizen’s arrest so
that I would be criminally charged for an action the police knew was not criminal.
These actions constitute criminal actions under the federal RICO statutes and
violate the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution.
5. The act of posting the property in south Maplewood with “no trespassing” signs is
not criminal, and Maplewood using the police to punish us for the postings was an
abuse of power.
The People of the state of Minnesota established our government to serve and protect Us.
Each elected official, as well as members of the Executive branch (such as police officers) have
sworn an oath to uphold our constitutions, which secure certain rights to the People. Under the
constitutions, the People have secured their right of redress for injuries done against Them.
Employees and elected officials within the artificial entity known as the City of Maplewood have
repeatedly and knowing violated their oaths of office.
The governing body of the City of Maplewood will uphold their oaths of office by:
1. Responding to and paying for the damages the City has done to the Citizens.
2. Investigating and disciplining those City employees that have violated the rights
of the Citizens.
3. Complying with the statutory and constitutional restraints placed upon the City in
governing the People.
4. Creating processes that ensure the rights of the Citizens will no longer be violated.
Failure of the governing body of Maplewood to act upon taking these so stated steps to rectify
the abuses against the People will be further evidence of the necessity of the People to dissolve
the artificial entity known as the City of Maplewood.
We the People have determined that we are “self-governed” and have set forth the restraints we
have required for those that serve us in government. This is your final warning.
Written response to these demands must be made prior to April 16, 2008, or a federal
RICO lawsuit will be filed against the City of Maplewood.
Please take notice: In the federal RICO lawsuit, the Citizen plaintiffs will seek injunctive relief
for immediate removal from office of all Maplewood elected officials, as well as leave of the
court to place liens upon all properties owned by the City of Maplewood. Under the federal
RICO statutes prevailing plaintiffs are awarded TRIPLE damages and attorney fees. Given the
sworn court testimony of the Maplewood police officers this month, it is doubtful that
Maplewood would prevail in the federal lawsuit.
March 26, 2008
Nancy Lazaryan
Nancy Lazaryan
Mailing address: ****
Rice, MN 56367
Cell phone: ***-****
cc: H. Alan Kantrud, Ramsey County Undersheriff Altendorfer, members of the media.

8:08 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

Nancy informed me she would comment here on this issue.

I miss those spirited debates between Chuck and Nancy. It will be great to have her back.

8:22 AM  
Anonymous Thomas V. said...

Bob, What happened to Nancy because I havent seen her postinf for some time now ?

Thank you Bob .

9:17 AM  
Blogger Sharon 4Anderson said...

Nancy is absolutely correct concerning union,giving Salary/Grade increases, without public input, contrary to our Charter, SPSO means St.Paul Supervisory Orginazation,
Check out the fact city attorneys are members, THEREFORE Does City Attorneys owe their alligience to the "BAR",SPSO,tax supported employment or to We the People who pay the Bills poste on google

11:55 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

2:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have no idea what this is about, nor anything about Nancy but I've got to admit that I find the use of the RICO statue against the government strangely arousing!

You go girl!

4:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Thomas

She went away because she couldn't hijack threads any longer with her BS

Now she back and so is Sharon. Mext thing ya know, we'll be hearing insulation stories again.

6:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:33, there are some posters here that have fouler mouths than
the shit coming out of George Bushes mouth.

Whatever you feel about Nancy and Sharons participation here, give em a break,they have just as much a right to post here as Chuck,Eric and the rest of us.

Nancy has convictions and is all talk AND ACTION !

Sharon is just...... well,you know.

8:14 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What does George Bush have to do with this? What kind of foul things come out of his mouth?

9:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


9:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So how long before we go back to the lectures about personal responsibiltiy? I'd rather listen to Dahn than that crap. At least you can laugh at him!

9:53 PM  
Blogger Bob said...

Concerning Nancy coming back..


MANY folks find Nancy interesting. Then there is the few who feel as the negative posters here do toward her. I'm sure this time around she'll fit right in.

All I'm asking is give her a chance.

We need many perspectives and large numbers of folks to "seek the truth"!

I value everyone who post here.

10:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Her chance is up when she starts preaching. This is a town hall, not a church or grade school.

11:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Seems funny that Nancy was here first bitching about Maplewood and now low and behold the city manager gets fired.....hanky panky with his contract going on.....and then stories in the paper about their fiscal mess. I suppose all this is just another coiencidence that they are in so much turmoil and someone was on to them long before. Can't be much to this huh Chuck?

4:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am not the guy to figure out what has been going on in Maplewood one way or another. I live and work in Saint Paul.


Chuck Repke

8:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


To the Governing Body of Maplewood, Minnesota
When I spoke to the Maplewood City Council on March 23, 2008 I informed the council of the
events and results of the criminal trial against me, which was brought by Maplewood.

Hello Nancy,

What is the offense and circumstances?

Alex Wendt
"east side best side"

9:53 AM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

10:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

She's a looney tone.


12:06 PM  
Anonymous Mad Dog said...

Chuckk, one way or the other, you are a citizen just like the rest of us.
Do you read the news paper ?
People that do,usually care about whats going on around them.

You seem to be thinking about only one thing, saving your goat roepin
grunts down at city hall.
You cant answer to Nancy because she tells you how it is and you offer nothing credible to refute
the RICO mens claims.
You made yourself a target here now its time for you to put up or shut up.
Nancy can talk you under the table
and all you can do is try to spin it.

Seems like the only way you will talk about maplewood is if your employed down there at city hall and your kissing ass.
In the Army, we have a way of dealing with ass kissers and whimps.
Your not a team player.
Your a selfish hypocrite who only thinks of what matters to yourself and the peoples ass you kiss at city hall.

12:34 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why don't you knock off the "soveriegn people" thing, it makes you sound like a bunch of kooks. Not exactly the way to convince anybody of anything in my mind.

12:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wouldn't be so hard on Chuck. Thee's no one else who will give way their product for free, why should he. Chuck's commodity is "spin," and he's a professional......a "gun for hire" so to speak. If Maplewood wants to pay him for his professional services then they get the benifet of his spin. If they don't pay, then they take what they get, right Chuck?

12:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please google the word Sovereignty -

Thanks to Nancy and R kids We have learned to Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaA sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority, subject to no other. .... Sovereignty may be recognized even when the sovereign body possesses no territory ... -

Sovereign immunity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSovereign immunity, or crown immunity, is a type of immunity that in common law jurisdictions traces its origins from early English law. ... - 50k - Cached - Similar pages

1:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What Chuck meant to say is he doesn't get non-profit money from Maplewood so he doesn't need to kiss anybodies ass there.Wouldn't it be nice to play the board game of a non-profit.I call it a board game because you play with other peoples money,never have to worry about making a profit,you get paid regaurdless if you make money or not and when a condo project fails you can fold up the board and put it back in the box.You lose nothing.Fun huh gang?

Tim Ciani

1:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tim, Tim, Tim...

Nonprofit doesn't mean that I grow money in the back yard. It also doesn't mean that I don't have to be concerned about a balance sheet. I do just the same as any other business. The only difference between a for profit and a not for profit business is the tax requirements.

The condo's that you refer to are a joint venture with two for profit businesses. My role was site assembly. I went out and bought the land. I also did the community relations work and assisted in getting City zoning approvals.

So, here is the deal in the current project. For all of the hours I put into the deal, their is a very high chance that the agency or me will never see a dime. The market sucks and sales are down and the bills keep having to be paid.

The for profit guys have real blood in this. The way the deal is structured they are paying the property taxes on all of those vacant units and still have to pay the construction loans.

So, don't tell me about pretend money. The nonprofit development company get $0 from the City for operating moneys. It only gets a pertentage from projects that occur - no rehabs, no new buildings, no money.

That is why a lot of my efforts are in partnership with for profits. I just did the site assembly for the new Cub on the east side. That will pay the bills more than anything I do with the City all year.

Some day I will find out who you are and you can come over here and I'll show you the books. You will find out what a small nonpofit goes through. I still have to pay property taxes on my buildings, still have to pay someone to cut the grass, and shovel snow. The business has no income tax is the only difference.


Chuck Repke

3:15 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Some day I will find out who you are" Chuck Repke

Chuck, let's be honest here. You and Dave already know who Tim is.

5:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"My role was site assembly. I went out and bought the land. I also did the community relations work and assisted in getting City zoning approvals."

I can't believe you'd admit to this Chuck. Is what your saying is that you're a real estate "Flipper?"

6:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It doesn't make any difference if you live in Maplewood or not Chuck. Just jump right in with your can just "wing it" like you always do and then let Nancy chew you up for a while!

6:24 PM  
Blogger Nancy Lazaryan said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

10:16 PM  
Anonymous Sgt.Slaughter said...

Somthing by Eric about meeting some anonymous poster at Govenors
for a show down.

Looks like Eric got it good !!!

AWOL just like private Chuck.


11:37 PM  
Anonymous Sgt.Slaughter said...

Bob, can you correct my spelling on that last post ?

11:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

we don't care about spelling around here sarge.

most grunts can't spell anyway.

8:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

6:18 - for the Cub deal, I was the real estate agent. For other deals, you would be correct, I would be a "flipper," but not in the way you would think. I usually lose in a flip by design.


Chuck Repke

11:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
6:18 - for the Cub deal, I was the real estate agent. For other deals, you would be correct, I would be a "flipper," but not in the way you would think. I usually lose in a flip by design.


Chuck Repke



11:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:24 AM,

You hit the nail on the head more than you know.

8:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:24 AM

Thanks to the people that care about someone or something other then themselves.
Thune and Chuck have a insight about greed and the bottom will fall out and they will be prosecuted for their double handed and double standard roll they play in St.Paul's greedy government

7:58 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...



9:52 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Say, 'Old Friend'? Lose the caps man; makes you look like a doof.

11:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


11:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

11:57 AM The Old Friend

Don't Stop Posting because of what Swiftee said...

Swiftee -
could just be Dave Thune - or -
one of Dave Thune's buddies.
People come out of the wood work just to shut our mouths.

2:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous said... 12:06 PM

She's a looney tone.


Is this J really someone name Chuck, Dave, Rick Mons, Chris Coleman, or one of their friends.

4:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know Swiftee.

His name is Swift for real and he is a hardcore conservative. Use to live in St Paul now lives in Mendota or West St paul. I can't stand his politics or personality and believe him to be a homophobe but, compared to some of you, I'd rather have breakfast at Tiffinay's with him then hang out with some of you. Oh, he's an accomplished martial artist that adds to his crap talking. All in all though, he's no dummy.

The fact that some of you could possibly think that he is Thune (a decent man) or a friend of Thune completes the circle of retardation that began with your anti-city bitching.


12:02 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Eric shut up and go back to edemocracy you Uncle Tom!

8:09 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You're weak and pathetic which makes it hard to be offended by you.

Its like walking past a house with my Akita and some little Lhasa Apso is barking away. A dog with a 3000 year history of intelligence, fighting and surviving versus a 'purse poodle' of a yipper.

Its of no contest or importance. Stop your yipping.


8:43 AM  
Blogger Bob said...

I was just in the process of deleting the racial remark to Eric when I see you(Eric)responded to it.

If you want it deleted I will delete it Eric.

8:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Let it stay. It's just a little doggie yipping from the safety of the fence (anon) at the big one walking past.


11:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not Chris or Eric or Chuck - closer to Swiftee than those guys. But I still think Nancy is looney tones!


1:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

After the landlords get done kicking the city's ass Eric, you'll be begging to meet and have a drink with them so you can look like you were a part of the remedy against this oppresive city rather than a supporter

9:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"yip, yip, yip"

7:02 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home